Both applications are highly customizable, so those figures can easily be adjusted. eM Client’s defaults fared better with 71% and 29%, respectively. Blunderbuss: Outlookĭoing some quick math, my default Outlook email view comprised 59% email to 41% tools, options, navigation, and other onscreen distractions. It might only be a fraction or two of a second, but it’s noticeable on all but the newest workstations, and a series of small micro-pauses sure adds up over the working day.Įmail content vs. For users on older hardware, the Outlook experience can be frustrating switching between Calendar and Email can sometimes take a while to “percolate” through. The first thing I noted was the app’s speed: pages rendered and responded quickly to input, and where Outlook felt sluggish and bloated at times, everything on eM Client was snappy and responsive.

Mac users often struggle with some of the Exchange/Outlook features (meeting invites, email receipts, synchronization, and a few more) because the Apple eco-system has often been something of an afterthought of Microsoft’s developers (Apple produces its own walled garden versions of email, word processor, spreadsheet, presentation software, and so forth).įor Mac users, there is an eM Client application, but that isn’t the subject of this test. However, in this review, I kept the focus on how eM Client performs as a pure Microsoft replacement. The app is compatible with Google Workspace, iCloud, any POP/IMAP email server, and Office 365 and Exchange. The Outlook interface is familiar to most people, whether they use the app daily, so most users will easily find their way around eM Client quickly.Īll the usual suspects are there: email (obviously), calendars, Tasks, Contacts, and you can easily import your existing settings from Outlook. To test out this alternative email (and everything else) client, I ran eM Client instead of Outlook on a Windows 10 instance to see how it performed compared to the app we’re all accustomed to.

Compare em client free and professional